|
MLA Newsletter | ||
|
Music Library Association
|
No. 168 |
March-April 2012 |
|
|
| President’s Report Jerry McBride , MLA President |
Jerry L. McBride |
|
Jazz Collections and Performance Practice at the University of North Texas |
![]() Andy Leach plays lap steel guitar during MLA band rehearsal, taken by Gerry Szymanski |
![]() Morris Levy and Tara Wood pause for Gerry Szymanski |
Annual Meeting |
Annual Meeting |
BCC Townhall: Breaking News in Cataloging RDA updates were presented by Kathy Glennan, Mark Scharff, Damian Iseminger, Robert Freeborn, Steve Yusko, and Casey Mullin. Chapters 6, 9,10,11, and 17 of RDA are under review. The JSC approved a proposal for broadening RDA7.24 (Artistic and/or Technical Credit) to allow for recording this element for sound recordings. Implementation is delayed so the instruction can be generalized formultiple types of resources. RDA training opportunities will be provided by ALA-ALCTS at ALA Annual 2012. Additional opportunities will be available through webinars. Further information can be found at http://www.ala.org/alcts/confevents/upcoming/webinar. Updates on the genre/form and medium of performance projects were presented by Beth Iseminger, Hermine Vermeij, and Bruce Evans. The Library of Congress Genre Form Thesaurus (LCGFT) and the LC medium vocabulary will eventually replace LCSH terms for music resources. Until that work is complete, catalogers should assign LCSH subject headings as usual. To prepare for implementation, music catalogers should communicate to technical services and systems librarians at their institutionsthe importance of genre/form access for music. The Subjects subcommittee is working on medium of performance terminology. A preliminary list of medium terms is available on LC’s website. To facilitate medium implementation, the MARC subcommittee submitted a successful MARBI proposal to expand field382. Damian Iseminger and Bruce Evansdiscussed the resource Thematic Indexes Used in the Library of Congress/NACO Authority File, which meets the need for a list of thematic indexes used in creating authorized and variant access points in the Library of Congress/NACO Authority File. The resource can be viewed at http://bcc.musiclibraryassoc.org/BCC-Historical/BCC2011/Thematic_Indexes.htm. Steve Yusko discussed LC’s Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative. The main goal is creating a metadata format to replace MARC21. Details can be found at http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/. All music catalogers are encouraged to provide feedback. |
Annual Meeting |
RDA and Linked Data: Moving Beyond the Rules In the twenty-first century information landscape, everything is interconnected. Jenn Riley (UNC-Chapel Hill) and Kimmy Szeto (SUNY Maritime College) presented a session which explored these connections and their implications for libraries, which will need to maintain and share data beyond their own walls, and indeed beyond the scope of the traditional library community. Riley began the session with an overview of the Semantic Web (which she described as an “authority file on steroids”) and Linked Data, which uses URIs for identification. These URIs can then be used to discover more information about a thing, and also link to other URIs, which can lead to still further discoveries. RDA data elements could be the basis of machine interoperability of data in a Linked Data environment. |

MLA band members rehearse, taken by Gerry Szymanski
Annual Meeting |
“Musical Theater: Jewish Audience and Influence”
|
Annual Meeting |
Annual Meeting |
Features |
|
In this issue,we get to know Kathy Abromeit, Public Services Librarian at Oberlin Conservatory. |
| Developing Trends |
Jim Cassaro Yee-haw! I don’t know about you, but I’m still reeling from all the energy and excitement of our recent meeting in Dallas. Again, members of MLA showed how generous they are, and how that generosity is consistent from year to year. In Dallas, we raised a respectable $4,314.00. This includes $771.00 in sales from the MLA Shop, $1,859.00 from the Silent Auction, $275.00 to the MLA Fund, $1,035.00 to the Coral IAML Travel Grant Fund, and the balance divided among various other funds (Freeman, Ochs, Epstein, and Unrestricted). Bravo! We continue to make great strides in the development agenda for MLA. In Dallas, the Development Committee completed a draft of a document on how to establish endowment funds for the association. This important document will be sent to the MLA board for its consideration at its spring meeting in Middleton, WI. Such a policy will finally codify the steps necessary to establish endowments within MLA as well as create strong relationships with our donors. The creation of the necessary legal documents will also be implemented, so that we have a record of the donor, the amount of the endowment, how payments are to be made into the endowment, and rubrics on how the dividends available for use will be calculated. Also in Dallas, the Development Committee was given a presentation by Matt Bennett, the Special Audience Marketing Coordinator for GEICO Partnership Marketing on the process of establishing a partnership with MLA. Such a partnership would help increase revenue for the Association in the form of kickbacks for auto insurance quotes, as well as sponsorship money for our annual conference. The partnership is based on MLA members asking for quotes from GEICO—quotes only, purchase of a policy is not required—and depending on how many quotes are provided, a kickback is given to the association. For an organization of our size, our annual profit would be in the $3,500 to $5,000 dollar range, with an additional $1,000 offered to help sponsor an event (e.g., our annual conference). While the partnership is based on email contact with our members, the minute influx of advertising received by MLA members will be far outweighed by the monetary gain achieved. We will also be looking at setting up partnerships with other vendors, including Google, Brooks Brothers, Bank of America, and Amazon. Such outreach will begin to move our development agenda to outside sources of support. Prior to the annual meeting in Dallas, documents and information on legacy giving to the association were mounted on the MLA website (http://www.musiclibraryassoc.org/sub.aspx?id=46). Along with announcing the establishment of The Founders Circle—a planned giving initiative that is designed to ensure the legacy of both the association and the donor—the information provided supplies answers to a number of questions concerning planned giving, while the associated FAQs document further clarifies the terminology that pertains to planned giving. The FAQs also provide the association’s business address, the date of its incorporation, and its FEIN number for tax purposes. Any member of the association who wishes to establish or has already established a legacy gift should contact the MLA president and/or the development officer. I would be remiss if I did not thank the Denton Bach Players, and Andrew Justice, Director, for the wonderful concert played in support of the Lenore Coral IAML Travel Grant Fund. The superbly performed works—all from the music of the eighteenth century in which Lenore was interested—were interspersed with recorded excerpts of Lenore’s 1997 oral history interview, conducted by Jane Penner. It was wonderful to hear Lenore’s voice again, and to hear why she became a music librarian, how she rose in the ranks of her career, and what she saw of our future. The concert was attended by 150 people, all of whom left with a greater understanding of Lenore’s place in our history and her importance to the continued work of IAML. Dues renewals for FY 2012–2013 will be coming shortly, and I hope that when you re-up, you’ll consider a donation to the association, or to become a member of our two giving circles: the Orpheus Society and the Ostinato Club. Donations made at any time are very welcome and always greatly appreciated! |
| Bibliographic Control Committee Kathy Glennan, Chair |
The Bibliographic Control Committee (BCC) held two business meetings and sponsored three programs in Dallas, including “What It Is! Music Genre/Form and Medium of Performance Terms in the Future of Music Subject Access,” “BCC Town Hall (current topics in cataloging),” and “RDA and Linked Data: Moving Beyond the Rules.” All of the program sessions were well attended. For details on these programs, please see the separate reports published elsewhere in this newsletter. The BCC business meetings included subcommittee and task force updates, a revision to the BCC Procedures Manual, and an update to the BCC charge. For details on the subcommittee meetings, see their separate reports following in this issue. The committee spent time on RDA-related issues, hearing reports from the RDA Music Revisions Facilitation Task Force and the RDA Music Implementation Task Force, both formed during 2011. In the next year, various BCC subcommittees will be drafting RDA change proposals and reviewing the Types of Compositions for Use in Music Uniform Titles document to see how to make it compatible with RDA. BCC discussed what RDA training opportunities to pursue for MLA 2013, and which content would be delivered best in person versus other means. We will work with various groups (MOUG, NMP, Education Committee) on a possible training preconference or webinar. We will also work with the Public Services Committee and others on an RDA program proposal geared toward public services. Beth Iseminger and Hermine Vermeij reported on the latest developments with genre/form and medium of performance. As we approach finalizing the terms in each category, the groups will investigate how to authorize terms on the lists, add additional terms as needed, and work toward migration from existing headings to the new vocabularies. They will seek technical advice from individuals who have worked on large MARC database changes in the past. BCC will start tracking the work coming out of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging regarding proposed changes, policies and best practices for RDA implementation in 2013. The committee will prepare official responses representing the music community as needed. At the close of this meeting, Mark Scharff completed his four-year term as chair of the Descriptive Cataloging Subcommittee, and Michael Colby completed his service as the first SACO Music Funnel Coordinator. BCC thanked them for their outstanding service. We welcomed Tracey Snyder as the incoming chair of Descriptive and Nancy Lorimer as the new SACO Funnel Coordinator. Finally, I concluded my four years of service as BCC chair at this meeting. I am grateful for the opportunity to serve and thank everyone who supported and contributed to BCC’s activities over the past four years. I know BCC will be in good hands with my successor, Beth Iseminger. |
| Genre/Form Task Force Beth Iseminger, Chair |
With the new genre and medium vocabularies, the possibilities are great for describing resources with single works. In our world of sound recordings that contain multiple works for different genres and mediums, post-coordination will be problematic unless we have work records. For the genre project to be effective at all, it has to push us toward work records. Genre, medium, and other facets should be in work records and personal name records. In a linked data environment, the information would be pulled from those records for search results.
|
| Authorities Subcommittee Damian Iseminger, Chair |
The chair reviewed the activities of the subcommittee during the past year. The major accomplishment was the creation of the Web resource Thematic Indexes Used in the Library of Congress/NACO Authority File. The page went live on May 19, 2011. Revisions to the resource in August included semantic encoding of the resource using RDFa in XHTML. Members of Authorities worked with members of Descriptive on revisions to RDA chapter 6 which clarified the distinction between recording of data and construction of authorized access points. A draft proposal was submitted to BCC; however, work was ultimately suspended due to several mitigating factors. These included revisions to RDA chapter 6 submitted by the Canadian Committee on Cataloging (CCC) and the formation of the RDA Music Revisions Joint Task Force. Work will probably resume on the proposal this spring. Damian Iseminger, Casey Mullin, and Ray Schmidt were appointed by BCC to be members of the newly formed RDA Music Implementation Task Force, with Mullin also serving as its chair. The subcommittee reviewed the JSC-approved CCC proposals for revisions of music portions of RDA. These included: a reworking of the definition of vocal score; eliminating the option to use groups of instruments when recording the medium of performance for individual instruments; making explicit that accompanying ensembles should use the name of the type of ensemble followed by the word “ensemble” (e.g. string ensemble, wind ensemble, etc.); and clarifying the instruction as to when an accompanying instrument, other than a keyboard stringed instrument, should be supplied when the title is Songs, Lieder, etc. The subcommittee addressed possible revisions to the resource Thematic Indexes Used in the Library of Congress/NACO Authority File. They agreed that a form for suggesting new thematic indexes should be created. It will mirror the structure of entries on the Web page and also contain an additional field for documentation of abbreviation use. If a person submitting an index for inclusion wants to be able to use the index number in an authorized access point, a checkbox will be available to indicate the proposal should be forwarded to LC. The subcommittee enthusiastically discussed creating an MLA 2013 preconference for training on RDA music authorities, in partnership with the NACO-Music Project, MOUG, and the MLA Education Committee. |
| Descriptive Cataloging Subcommittee Mark Scharff, Chair |
Scharff summarized pertinent activities and discussions at the 2012 Midwinter meeting of ALA’s Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access (CC:DA). One such was the fate of the MLA-submitted proposal to broaden the scope of RDA 7.24 (Artistic/Technical Credits) to allow recording of such credits for sound recordings. The Joint Steering Committee approved the proposal, but delayed implementation until some problems regarding making it applicable to all resources could be worked out. OLAC will take the lead with this. A task force on Sources of Information in RDA, chaired by Scharff, reported on its progress in reworking the MLA proposal to clarify the status of publisher-issued containers as preferred sources of information, and to give preference to a collective title as the identifier for a resource as a whole. A fuller accounting of the CC:DAmeeting can be found on the BCC Web site under “ALA Reports.” SDC considered proposed changes to its charge to reflect name changes of ALA organizations and new terminology associated with RDA. The revision process will go on after the Dallas meeting. SDC will monitor the work of a CC:DA task force looking at making data elements in chapter three of RDA more machine-actionable, particularly by teasing apart data that represents more than one attribute (e.g. “1 score” combines an enumerative and physical-format subelements). One of the group’s early discoveries was that some statements for printed music add a third subelement, that of intellectual modification (e.g. “1 vocal score,” “1 conductor’s score.”). What this might mean is still up in the air. MLA has been asked by John Attig, the ALA representative to the Joint Steering Committee, to supply definitions for terms in the RDA Vocabularies that are music-related.Most will fall to the Authorities Subcommittee, but one, “Layout of tactile musical notation,” is clearly a Descriptive task. ALA’s representative to NISO had asked for CC:DA comment on ISO Standard 15707, defining an International Standard Musical Work Code (ISWC). SDC decided to inform the ALA response. The standard is up for renewal, and the options for comments were to retain, to cancel, or to update. Discussion in the meeting and by email led to a recommendation that the standard be revised to clarify how its terminology related to RDA/FRBR concepts and to explain some anomalies. The RDA Music Revisions Facilitation Task Force has asked SDC to propose a revision to RDA 2.11.1.3, which limits the recording of copyright dates to the latest one found in the resource. Patty Falk volunteered to work on this proposal, to be joined by other members of the subcommittee not present or not yet appointed. Another issue concerns authorized and variant access points for librettos, when the librettist and the composer are the same person and the titles of the libretto and opera are identical. If RDA 6.27.4.2 is applied in this situation, the variant access point for the libretto will be virtually identical to the authorized access point for the libretto. This instruction needs to be revised so as to avoid this specific situation. Damian Iseminger, Patty Falk, and members to be named later will collaborate on this proposal. The final issue concerns the use of the terms lyrics and texts in authorized access points in RDA. In 6.27.4.2 it is implied in an example that the access point for an incomplete compilation of song texts should include the author of the song texts followed by the collective title “Lyrics” and the term “Selections.” However, when the variant access point for this incomplete compilation is made according to 6.27.4.2, only the terms “Libretto,” Librettos,” “Text,” or “Texts” may be used. This is an inconsistency that needs to be addressed. In addition, the terms text, libretto, and lyrics are not defined in RDA. Defining these terms could help clarify the issue. Work on these related issues will begin when the new members of the Authorities and Descriptive Subcommittees are appointed by the MLA president. RDA proposals resulting from this work will hopefully be ready for BCC approval in April, so that they will be ready for submission to the ALA Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access (CC:DA) in May for consideration at ALA Annual.
|
Committee Reports |
| MARC Formats Subcommittee Bruce Evans, Chair |
In his MARBI report, Evans focused on two MLA-sponsored papers. The first was Proposal No. 2011-09, sponsored by MLA, which dealt with field 383 (Numeric Designation of Musical Work). The proposal advocated for creation of: 1) a code to identify the source of a thematic index number; 2) a code to identify the resource Thematic Indexes Used in the Library of Congress/NACO Authority File, an authoritative compilation of citations for thematic indexes, recently created by the Authorities Subcommittee; and 3) a way to clarify when different numbers are used for the same work by different publishers or indexers. Evans presented this proposal at ALA Annual 2011 and it passed. The second MLA-sponsored proposal was Proposal No. 2012-01, which was necessitated by the development of music genre/form and medium of performance vocabularies. In the new environment, genre/form terms will be recorded in the 655, but medium of performance terms will need to be accommodated elsewhere in the MARC format. The proposal presented two coding options: field 382 and a new 6xx field. The 382 option was chosen. The other MARBI paper was Discussion Paper 2012-DP01, which sought to make title information buried in the free text of an authority record’s 670 field machine-actionable. MARBI saw this effort as worthwhile, and the paper’s presenter will revise the DP and bring it back in the future as a Proposal. The other highlight from MARBI at Midwinter was a discussion of MARBI’s future in light of the Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative. The discussion included the role of MARBI vis-à-vis the Initiative’s development, future development of MARC, and the nature and role of MARBI itself. The LC representative to the subcommittee, Steve Yusko, reported on a discussion paper to make field 250 repeatable. It will be made available on the MARC Standards page. The subcommittee discussed RDA-related MARBI proposal ideas presented by Paradis. |
| Metadata Subcommittee Jenn Riley, Chair |
The Metadata Subcommittee meeting opened with a discussion of work that we should do in the upcoming year to prepare for a major membership change following the MLA 2013 conference. The subcommittee was created in 2009, and some members were given initial 4-year terms, which is typical of an MLA committee, while others were given 2-year terms. The individuals with 2-year terms rotated off in 2011, and in 2013, four members plus the chair will complete their terms. Some variability has been introduced with the addition of a single new member in 2010, and we must continue to work to stagger terms more effectively. Some specific strategies we might use to accomplish this would be to take one or more new members this year even though no members are rotating off, and consider appointing a member completing a term in 2013 to one more year. Ideally, subcommittee members would have some hands-on experience with non-MARC metadata, some digitization or digital library experience, and/or working knowledge of EAD or archival practice. As with any MLA committee, members must be willing and able to contribute. The subcommittee would benefit from members that represent both technical services and digital library departments. We hope the upcoming release of initial content for the music metadata clearinghouse will be good publicity for new subcommittee members. Most of the subcommittee’s meeting was spent discussing our work on the clearinghouse. The subcommittee had broken into subgroups to collect and generate content for a few initial sections of the clearinghouse, and these subgroups reported on their progress and asked the full group for advice in areas where help was needed. For metadata standards and their application to music, we selected a small subset of standards to start with (simple Dublin Core, Qualified Dublin Core, EAD, and MODS), and tabled others for future work. A decent amount of workflow documentation has been collected already, and this subgroup will only have to collect a few more examples to have enough content for an initial clearinghouse release. For training opportunities, we will focus on identifying and linking to ongoing training initiatives, rather than specific one-off classes. For articulating what types of work different standards are the best match for, we should ensure a music-specific bent and leave more general analysis to others. We discussed the difficult problem of keeping an online resource such as the clearinghouse up to date. The copyright Web site has a funded editor that spends significant time on the site, but this doesn’t seem feasible for the music metadata clearinghouse. The subcommittee decided to proceed in stages, with basic content going live at first, only committee members editing it for the first year, and then after that considering how best to open up to other contributors. |
| RDA Music Implementation Task Force Casey Mullin, Chair |
Since formally charged in Fall 2011, task force members have been using a wiki to populate a matrix of RDA rules which are germane to music resources and to identify and discuss issues which require best practices recommendations. The next task is compiling a prose document with MARC-specific best practices. The group will begin drafting the document in sections, as consensus is reached in the RDA rule matrix. The deadline for commenting on Chapters 1-3 is April 1, after which drafting the prose document will begin. Deliberation on authorities-specific issues (primarily Chapters 6, 9 and 11) will happen during summer 2012. The task force also discussed crafting full MARC record examples, workflows, and mappings for inclusion in the RDA Toolkit. The former will be done as part of compiling the prose document; the latter will be deferred until later. Nancy Lorimer already created basic mappings for music and will mount them to the wiki. The task force will divide up monitoring RDA work being done by specific persons and groups. These include the PCC, NMP, the RDA Music Revisions Facilitations Joint Task Force, the JSC, current RDA implementers who catalog music, and OLAC. The task force also will be soliciting feedback from interested parties at key points in its work. Lastly, one member of the task force will review recent literature regarding music cataloging, RDA, FRBR, etc., and compile summaries on the wiki. This should help guide the task force’s determination of best practices and will ideally prevent duplication of effort. The task force devoted its remaining meeting time to two RDA issues specific to music. The first concerns principal performers and performers-as-creators of resources, such as albums. Performing groups can fit the definition at 19.2.1.1.1 (d) of “corporate bodies considered to be creators.” The group needs to come up with an interpretation of this clause and its applicability, in addition to the similar rule in 6.28.1.5 (d). There is currently no relator term in RDA for performer-as-creator, so one might need to be proposed. Identifying compilations as performer-as-creator results in access points which are helpful for user identification. It also meets RDA’s core requirement to identify the “first or predominant” work embodied in a resource. Performer main entry does not exist in RDA for Western art music, which is a major departure from AACR2. Principal performers should be identified as such, especially in display, but they cannot be designated in the MARC 1XX block, as that block is reserved for creators of the entire resource. In such cases, the name of the principal performer often appears in the title area, which aids in identification and selection. The second specific issue concerns terminology used to refer to specific sound recording carriers. Rather than using “compact disc” in RDA description, the suggested verbiage is “CD audio” with other codes used to generate text or icons in displays. |
| RDA Revisions Joint Task Force Steve Yusko and Rob Freeborn, Co-chairs |
The seven-member task force, representing three different JSC constituencies (LC, MLA/ALA, CAML/CCC), was charged in October 2011 to identify known RDA music issues, prioritize them, and assign them to one of the three constituencies for proposals to resolve the issue. They have identified 48 separate issues and ranked them as either high or medium priority. During this morning’s meeting, they examined a list of 22 high priority music issues. The list also included music catalogers’ high-priority concerns as well as three issues from Mark Scharff’s 2010 list. Four issues from Chapter 2: Two issues from Chapter 3: Eleven issues from Chapter 6: One issue from Chapter 7: One issue from the Glossary: |
| Subject Access Subcommittee Hermine Vermeij, Chair |
|
Committee Reports |
| Education Commmittee Submitted by Lisa Shiota and Abby Cross |
Education Outreach Program Subcommittee Holling Smith-Borne (former Education Committee member and a founder of the Education Outreach Program) and John Wagstaff will be participating in a panel discussion about training programs for music library staff at IAML’s annual meeting this July in Montreal. Also on the panel will be representatives from the Bavarian State Library in Munich, Germany, and the Northern College of Music in Manchester, United Kingdom. Directory of Library School Offerings in Music Librarianship |
|
|
Nicholas Casas, Chicago, IL
|
Joseph Daniel Olivarez, College Station, TX |
| Our best wishes to all those pursuing new opportunities. Jieun Kang, Humanities Librarian, Grinnell College Maristella Feustle, Music Special Collections Librarian, University of North Texas Lina Terjesen, Music Librarian, Belmont University John Morgan-Bush, Senior Library Clerk, Technical Services, Mannes The New School Bojana Skarich, Non-Print Catalog Librarian, Michigan State University Richard Griscom, Editor, MLA Index and Bibliography Series, Music Library Association Mark Zelesky, Technical Library Assistant, Rowan University Nathan Coy, Audio Digitization Technician, University of California Santa Barbara Laura Stokes, Performing Arts Librarian, Brown University Sarah Griffin, Public Services Library Assistant, Duke University Laura Brown, Music Cataloger (part-time), Old Dominion University Frank Ferko, Cataloging Assistant, Westminster Choir College of Rider University |
| In Recognition |
We appreciate our Corporate Patrons and Corporate Members and their support of MLA. Corporate Members
|
| MLA News |
| Announcements: MLA and Beyond |
Call for Nominations: MLA Citation & Board Members The MLA Citation, the association's tribute for lifetime achievement, is awarded in recognition of contributions to the profession over a career. MLA membership need not be a pre-requisite to the receiving of a citation, but the recipient should have contributed to the national affairs of the association and to the furthering of the association's aims, even if not via MLA directly. Three new Members-at-Large will be elected to the Board of Directors for a two-year term from 2013 to 2015. Board members represent the membership as they carry out the association's work. The three incoming members will be selected by the president to serve as Assistant Parliamentarian, Assistant Planning and Reports Officer, or Assistant Fiscal Officer. Nominations should reflect the entire range and nature of the work of the Association's members. Incumbents may not succeed themselves. Candidates for office must be personal members of the association. Neil Hughes, University of Georgia Anna Kijas, University of Connecticut Steven Nordstrom, Brigham Young University Amanda Pilmer, Fairfax County Public Schools |
| Announcements: MLA and Beyond |
MLA Midwest Chapter Announces New Logo |
Announcements: MLA and Beyond |
Moug Announces 2012 Distinguished Service Award Recipient Phyllis Jones joined the NACO-Music Project in 1994, gaining independent status under the guidance of Mark Scharff. Mark notes that Phyllis was his first NMP reviewee and that he has been “pleased that we continue this relationship to this day, though as often as not, I’m asking her assistance with a cataloging issue.” Indeed, her eagle eye is one of several characteristics that were repeatedly mentioned in statements on her behalf. This eagle eye has manifested itself not only in her improvements of existing bibliographic and authority records but also, and even more laudably, in collaborations resulting in some of the music cataloger’s most useful tools. Mickey Koth notes her collaboration in keeping the online manual Types of Compositions for Use in Music Uniform Titles and the NACO-Music Project Handbook both updated, as well as the invaluable suggestions she made while reading the drafts of Mickey’s 2008 book Uniform Titles for Music. Phyllis is a contributor to Authority Tools for Audiovisual and Music Catalogers: An Annotated List of Useful Resources, and author of Every Monday Morning: A Discography of American Labor Songs in the Conservatory Library at Oberlin College. It should go without saying that she is herself a highly regarded NACO-Music Project reviewer of long standing. In this context, Phyllis Jones’s productivity as a creator of bibliographic and authority records is all the more astonishing. Mickey Koth reports that since the inception of the NACO-Music Project, Oberlin has contributed 16,321 new and 8,697 changed authority records, the lion’s share of which is Phyllis Jones’s work. Her cataloging is not only exemplary but exceeds AACR2 requirements in thoroughness and usefulness. For example, Oberlin bibliographic records for sound recordings tend to have complete analytics even for single-composer collections, and they are backed up by careful authority work. Many in the cataloging community know Phyllis Jones well after a fashion, thanks to her thoughtful, lively, and constructive presence on listservs such as MLA-L and NMP-L – but most of us know her only virtually. As Chuck Herrold notes in his nomination letter: “Phyllis is not one who enjoys attending meetings and is not well known personally to many MOUG members. I do know her—she is thoughtful, articulate, quiet, modest, and genuine. To use an overworked (but accurate) phrase: ‘a cataloger’s cataloger.’ Honoring her in this way is long overdue.” Moug Announces 2012 Ralph Papakhian Travel Grant Recipient Sonia Archer-Capuzzo is Library Technician and Cataloger in the Jackson Library at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG), where she also earned a DMA in clarinet performance and ethnomusicology (2008) and the MLIS (2011). Previously she worked as a student assistant and supervisor in the UNCG Music Library. Among the numerous awards she has received are a SEMLA travel grant (2011), first prize in the UNCG Concerto Competition (2007), and grants to fund her dissertation research (2006, 2007). She is an adjunct lecturer in the UNCG School of Music. Her research interests, as documented by an already impressive list of conference presentations and publications, include performance-related injuries in clarinetists, fieldwork in librarianship, and music as a means to promote communication and trust between Israelis and Palestinians, this last being the subject of her dissertation. For more information about MOUG, please visit http://www.musicoclcusers.org. Press contact: |
![]() Vincent Pelote peforms at MLA Banquet Cocktail Hour, taken by Gerry Szymanski |
| Calendar |
May 4-5 |
| Members’ Publications |
Please send citations for items published or premiered in the past calendar year to the column editor, Mac Nelson, via e-mail or USPS mail at the address below. Please follow the citation style employed below. You must be a current MLA member to submit citations. Mac Nelson Books Articles Dougan, Kirstin (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne) Moore, Tom (Durham, North Carolina) “The Fifth Book of Airs of Cambini.”Flute Focus (24 October 2011). “The Fifty Grand Studies, Op. 126, by Peter Joseph von Lindpaintner.”Flute Focus (26 November 2011). “The Etude or Exercises for the Flute, Op. 2, by Karl Theodor Metzger.” Flute Focus (22 December 2011). “The Vingt-quatregrands Caprices pour une Flute of Philip Seydler.” Flute Focus (27 December 2011). “Conversation with C. Bryan Rulon.”Sonograma13 (8 January 2012). Hennion, Antoine, "Soli Deo Gloria: Was Bach a Composer?" “The Six ThèmesFavoris, op. 71, and Caprices, op. 80 of A.B. "The Recueild’AirsVariéesArrangées pour une Flute par “The Flute Sonatas of Albert Jacob Steinfeld.”Flute Focus(17 February 2012). “The Délassemens du Flûtiste (Solos, Airs variés, Rondeaux, |